Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Article 2 of the ECHR can also impose a positive obligation on the State to protect life - see Osman v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245. In its most basic form this requires states to have criminal justice systems that punish and deter homicide. However, it can also include an operational obligation on states to take preventative measures to protect individuals when [...]. This obligation is not as broad as it sounds, as liability will only attach to state authorities if they knew, or ought to have known, that there was a real and immediate risk to life but failed to take appropriate measures.
Answer
their life is at risk from other individuals or from suicide

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Article 2 of the ECHR can also impose a positive obligation on the State to protect life - see Osman v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245. In its most basic form this requires states to have criminal justice systems that punish and deter homicide. However, it can also include an operational obligation on states to take preventative measures to protect individuals when [...]. This obligation is not as broad as it sounds, as liability will only attach to state authorities if they knew, or ought to have known, that there was a real and immediate risk to life but failed to take appropriate measures.
Answer
?

Tags
#freedom-of-person #human-rights #public
Question
Article 2 of the ECHR can also impose a positive obligation on the State to protect life - see Osman v UK (2000) 29 EHRR 245. In its most basic form this requires states to have criminal justice systems that punish and deter homicide. However, it can also include an operational obligation on states to take preventative measures to protect individuals when [...]. This obligation is not as broad as it sounds, as liability will only attach to state authorities if they knew, or ought to have known, that there was a real and immediate risk to life but failed to take appropriate measures.
Answer
their life is at risk from other individuals or from suicide
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
EHRR 245. In its most basic form this requires states to have criminal justice systems that punish and deter homicide. However, it can also include an operational obligation on states to take preventative measures to protect individuals when <span>their life is at risk from other individuals or from suicide. This obligation is not as broad as it sounds, as liability will only attach to state authorities if they knew, or ought to have known, that there was a real and immediate risk to life

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.