A secured creditor was given precedence over other factors such as the poor health of the husband. Purle J also noted that Mrs Taylor’s reluctance to ‘downsize’ the family home was not of any special significance on the facts.
Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
Putnam & Sons v Taylor
Answer
?
Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
Putnam & Sons v Taylor
Answer
A secured creditor was given precedence over other factors such as the poor health of the husband. Purle J also noted that Mrs Taylor’s reluctance to ‘downsize’ the family home was not of any special significance on the facts.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Putnam & Sons v Taylor [2009] EWHC 317 (Ch) in which a secured creditor was given precedence over other factors such as the poor health of the husband. Purle J also noted that Mrs Taylor’s reluctance to ‘dow
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.