Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
Neuberger J held that TLATA 1996, s 15 had changed the law and the court now had greater flexibility in dealing with applications. Old case law should, therefore, be treated with caution, although not jettisoned
Answer
The Mortgage Corporation v Shaire

Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
Neuberger J held that TLATA 1996, s 15 had changed the law and the court now had greater flexibility in dealing with applications. Old case law should, therefore, be treated with caution, although not jettisoned
Answer
?

Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
Neuberger J held that TLATA 1996, s 15 had changed the law and the court now had greater flexibility in dealing with applications. Old case law should, therefore, be treated with caution, although not jettisoned
Answer
The Mortgage Corporation v Shaire
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
The Mortgage Corporation v Shaire and others [2001] Ch 743 Neuberger J held that TLATA 1996, s 15 had changed the law and the court now had greater flexibility in dealing with applications. Old case law should, therefore, be treated with caution, although not jettisoned

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.