Ali v Hussein (1974) 231 EG 372 In this case, there were several co-owners, one of whom wished the land to be sold in order to retrieve his investment. The court made an order postponing the sale for a period of some months [Why?].
Answer
to allow the other co-owners to get together in order to buy out the co-owner who wished to be released
Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
Ali v Hussein (1974) 231 EG 372 In this case, there were several co-owners, one of whom wished the land to be sold in order to retrieve his investment. The court made an order postponing the sale for a period of some months [Why?].
Answer
?
Tags
#co-ownership #land #law
Question
Ali v Hussein (1974) 231 EG 372 In this case, there were several co-owners, one of whom wished the land to be sold in order to retrieve his investment. The court made an order postponing the sale for a period of some months [Why?].
Answer
to allow the other co-owners to get together in order to buy out the co-owner who wished to be released
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it >Ali v Hussein (1974) 231 EG 372 In this case, there were several co-owners, one of whom wished the land to be sold in order to retrieve his investment. The court made an order postponing the sale for a period of some months to allow the other co-owners to get together in order to buy out the co-owner who wished to be released. Here, under the pre-TLATA 1996 principles, the court was clearly trying to maintain a balance between the respective interests of the parties. The court can take a similar approach und
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.