#constitution #law #public
An interesting dispute relating to the scope of parliamentary privilege was decided by the Supreme Court in R v Chaytor and Others [2010] UKSC 52. The appellant former MPs were attempting to argue that they should not be subject to the jurisdiction of the Crown Court in relation to charges against them of false accounting (relating to dishonest expenses claims), on the grounds that parliamentary privilege attached to all 'proceedings in Parliament'.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
cannot see any pdfsSummary
status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
---|
last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
---|
started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
---|
Details