Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



#constitution #law #public
An interesting dispute relating to the scope of parliamentary privilege was decided by the Supreme Court in R v Chaytor and Others [2010] UKSC 52. The appellant former MPs were attempting to argue that they should not be subject to the jurisdiction of the Crown Court in relation to charges against them of false accounting (relating to dishonest expenses claims), on the grounds that parliamentary privilege attached to all 'proceedings in Parliament'.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

pdf

cannot see any pdfs


Summary

statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Details



Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.