In this case denial of access to legal advice during questioning following arrest constituted a violation of the ECHR, art 6 and in particular art 6(1), read together with art 6(3)(c).
Answer
Murray (John) v UK
Tags
#hra #law #public
Question
In this case denial of access to legal advice during questioning following arrest constituted a violation of the ECHR, art 6 and in particular art 6(1), read together with art 6(3)(c).
Answer
?
Tags
#hra #law #public
Question
In this case denial of access to legal advice during questioning following arrest constituted a violation of the ECHR, art 6 and in particular art 6(1), read together with art 6(3)(c).
Answer
Murray (John) v UK
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Murray (John) v UK (1996) 22 EHRR 29. in this case denial of access to legal advice during questioning following arrest constituted a violation of the ECHR, art 6 and in particular art 6(1), read together with art 6(3)(c). Article 6(3)(c) of the ECHR entitles a person charged with a criminal offence 'to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing'. The court recognised that
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.