Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



#duty #law #negligence #tort
In such cases, the courts should look on the construction of the statute in question, and ascertain from it whether Parliament had granted a power to act, or a (mandatory) duty to do so. Here it appeared that Parliament had created a power to act, not a duty and, therefore, it had not intended a private individual to have a right to compensation. See also: West v Buckinghamshire County Council (1985) 83 LGR 449; Danns v Department of Health (1995) 25 BMLR 121.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

pdf

cannot see any pdfs


Summary

statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Details


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.