#duty #law #negligence #tort
As a general rule the courts are reluctant to impose a duty in situations in which the wrong in question was actually committed by a third party. So, for example, in P. Perl (Exporters) Ltd v Camden London Borough Council [1984] QB 342 the Court of Appeal stated that there was insufficient foreseeability for a council to be liable for the acts of a thief who entered one of the defendant’s empty properties.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
cannot see any pdfsSummary
status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
---|
last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
---|
started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
---|
Details