Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



#breach #negligence #tort
If any injury that may occur would be serious, greater care will be needed than if the risk of injury was slight. Thus in Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 the claimant had only one good eye, a fact known to his employers, the defendants. Despite this, no protective goggles were provided and he became blind when a piece of metal went into his good eye. The House of Lords held that the defendant was liable. Although the risk of injury was small, the consequences of the injury were significant.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

pdf

cannot see any pdfs


Summary

statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Details



Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.