Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



#equity #law #strangers
Except where the fiduciary and the assistant were acting in a joint venture, the accessory is not liable for profit made by the fiduciary: they are only liable for any profit that they made. In Ultraframe at [1600] (followed in Aerostar) Lewison J stated, ‘I can see that it makes sense for a dishonest assistant to be jointly and severally liable for any loss which the beneficiary suffers as a result of a breach of trust. I can also see it makes sense for a dishonest assistant to be liable to disgorge any profit which he has made as a result of the breach. However, I cannot take the next step to the conclusion that the dishonest assistant is also liable to pay to the beneficiary an amount equal to a profit which he did not make and which has produced no corresponding loss to the beneficiary.’
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

pdf

cannot see any pdfs


Summary

statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Details



Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.