Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.

#equity #law #secret-trust
Similarly, in Margulies v Margulies (1999-2000) 2 ITELR 641, a father’s ambiguous statements about the claimant’s older brother ‘knowing his wishes’ and ‘giving what’s appropriate’ were held not to create a binding legal obligation. A further argument that the father left these statements deliberately vague for tax reasons was also rejected by the court.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"


cannot see any pdfs


statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on



Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.