#equity #law #secret-trust
One would expect that just as a gift by will to B or to T expressly on trust for B will lapse if B predeceases the testator (if B is not the testator’s child leaving surviving issue of their own) so also a gift will lapse if to X on a secret trust for B who predeceases the testator. Surprisingly, such a gift to a secret predeceasing beneficiary was held not to lapse in Re Gardner (No 2) [1923] 2 Ch 230. Romer J erroneously assumed that B acquired a proprietary interest as if the secret trustee, T, on accepting the testator’s directions, had declared a trust for B of whatever the testator was bequeathing to T for B. Such a trust of a hope is, however, ineffective as it is not a trust of existing property. His decision ought not to be followed
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
cannot see any pdfsSummary
status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
---|
last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
---|
started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
---|
Details