#jr #law #public
R v Servite Houses & London Borough of Wandsworth, ex parte Goldsmith [2001] LGR 55 and R (on the application of A) v Partnerships In Care [2002] EWHC (Admin) 529 both concerned contracting-out provisions. In Goldsmith, the respondent company was found not to be exercising a public function in the provision of residential accommodation for the elderly. In Partnerships in Care, however, the managers of a private psychiatric hospital were deemed to be exercising a public function when they changed the focus of one of its wards from providing psychotherapeutic services to one primarily designed to treat patients with mental illness.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
cannot see any pdfsSummary
status | not read | | reprioritisations | |
---|
last reprioritisation on | | | suggested re-reading day | |
---|
started reading on | | | finished reading on | |
---|
Details