Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



#defences #law #negligence #tort
It does not matter that the claimant has not broken the law. In Froom v Butcher [1976] QB 286, even though the wearing of seat belts was not compulsory, the plaintiff was contributorily negligent for failing to wear one since it was imprudent, and the failure to wear the belt contributed to the plaintiff’s injuries.
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"

pdf

cannot see any pdfs


Summary

statusnot read reprioritisations
last reprioritisation on suggested re-reading day
started reading on finished reading on

Details


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.