As the House of Lords observed in [Case], judicial review will not normally be granted where an alternative remedy is available. In most cases, the remedy of a taxpayer lies in the appeal procedures provided by the tax statutes. The taxpayer will be expected to use the appeal procedure rather than resort to judicial review.
Answer
R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Preston
Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
As the House of Lords observed in [Case], judicial review will not normally be granted where an alternative remedy is available. In most cases, the remedy of a taxpayer lies in the appeal procedures provided by the tax statutes. The taxpayer will be expected to use the appeal procedure rather than resort to judicial review.
Answer
?
Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
As the House of Lords observed in [Case], judicial review will not normally be granted where an alternative remedy is available. In most cases, the remedy of a taxpayer lies in the appeal procedures provided by the tax statutes. The taxpayer will be expected to use the appeal procedure rather than resort to judicial review.
Answer
R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Preston
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it As the House of Lords observed in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Preston [1985] AC 835, judicial review will not normally be granted where an alternative remedy is available. In most cases, the remedy of a taxpayer lies in the appeal procedures provided by
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.