Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
The leading case on Ouster Clauses is Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 137. In this case, the Foreign Compensation Act 1950 provided that a determination made by the Foreign Compensation Commission (FCC) 'shall not be called into question in any court of law'. Anisminic Ltd. wished to challenge a determination of the FCC on the grounds that it had misconstrued the legal effect of the statutory framework under which it operated, and had therefore reached an illegal decision. The House of Lords held that the ouster clause [did / did not?] prevent Anisminic from challenging the decision of the FCC.
Answer
did not

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
The leading case on Ouster Clauses is Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 137. In this case, the Foreign Compensation Act 1950 provided that a determination made by the Foreign Compensation Commission (FCC) 'shall not be called into question in any court of law'. Anisminic Ltd. wished to challenge a determination of the FCC on the grounds that it had misconstrued the legal effect of the statutory framework under which it operated, and had therefore reached an illegal decision. The House of Lords held that the ouster clause [did / did not?] prevent Anisminic from challenging the decision of the FCC.
Answer
?

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
The leading case on Ouster Clauses is Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 137. In this case, the Foreign Compensation Act 1950 provided that a determination made by the Foreign Compensation Commission (FCC) 'shall not be called into question in any court of law'. Anisminic Ltd. wished to challenge a determination of the FCC on the grounds that it had misconstrued the legal effect of the statutory framework under which it operated, and had therefore reached an illegal decision. The House of Lords held that the ouster clause [did / did not?] prevent Anisminic from challenging the decision of the FCC.
Answer
did not
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
to challenge a determination of the FCC on the grounds that it had misconstrued the legal effect of the statutory framework under which it operated, and had therefore reached an illegal decision. The House of Lords held that the ouster clause <span>did not prevent Anisminic from challenging the decision of the FCC.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.