Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
A total ouster clause is one that appears completely to exclude judicial review. The courts are generally hostile to total ouster clauses as they are seen, in constitutional terms,to represent a challenge to the rule of law. Judicial review is seen as a basic right of all citizens. The modern judiciary has responded by developing [what?]. Almost invariably, therefore, the courts will hold that judicial review was not intended to be excluded.
Answer
an extremely strong presumption of statutory interpretation that Parliament does not intend to exclude judicial review

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
A total ouster clause is one that appears completely to exclude judicial review. The courts are generally hostile to total ouster clauses as they are seen, in constitutional terms,to represent a challenge to the rule of law. Judicial review is seen as a basic right of all citizens. The modern judiciary has responded by developing [what?]. Almost invariably, therefore, the courts will hold that judicial review was not intended to be excluded.
Answer
?

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
A total ouster clause is one that appears completely to exclude judicial review. The courts are generally hostile to total ouster clauses as they are seen, in constitutional terms,to represent a challenge to the rule of law. Judicial review is seen as a basic right of all citizens. The modern judiciary has responded by developing [what?]. Almost invariably, therefore, the courts will hold that judicial review was not intended to be excluded.
Answer
an extremely strong presumption of statutory interpretation that Parliament does not intend to exclude judicial review
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
are generally hostile to total ouster clauses as they are seen, in constitutional terms,to represent a challenge to the rule of law. Judicial review is seen as a basic right of all citizens. The modern judiciary has responded by developing <span>an extremely strong presumption of statutory interpretation that Parliament does not intend to exclude judicial review. Almost invariably, therefore, the courts will hold that judicial review was not intended to be excluded.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.