Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
However, in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bulger, [2001] 3 All ER 449 the application of the father of the murder victim to challenge the setting of the tariff sentence given to the two defendants was [...]. The Divisional Court held that, in criminal cases, the only two parties with an interest are the Crown and the defendant, and therefore a third party does not have a right to intervene in this context.
Answer
dismissed for lack of standing

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
However, in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bulger, [2001] 3 All ER 449 the application of the father of the murder victim to challenge the setting of the tariff sentence given to the two defendants was [...]. The Divisional Court held that, in criminal cases, the only two parties with an interest are the Crown and the defendant, and therefore a third party does not have a right to intervene in this context.
Answer
?

Tags
#jr #law #public
Question
However, in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bulger, [2001] 3 All ER 449 the application of the father of the murder victim to challenge the setting of the tariff sentence given to the two defendants was [...]. The Divisional Court held that, in criminal cases, the only two parties with an interest are the Crown and the defendant, and therefore a third party does not have a right to intervene in this context.
Answer
dismissed for lack of standing
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
dy>However, in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Bulger, [2001] 3 All ER 449 the application of the father of the murder victim to challenge the setting of the tariff sentence given to the two defendants was dismissed for lack of standing. The Divisional Court held that, in criminal cases, the only two parties with an interest are the Crown and the defendant, and therefore a third party does not have a right to intervene

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.