In [case], the court held that spitting on a policeman's coat was not criminal damage. This decision seems to imply that there has to be some expense on the part of the owner to restore the property to its previous condition.
Answer
A (a juvenile) v R [1978] Crim LR 689
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
In [case], the court held that spitting on a policeman's coat was not criminal damage. This decision seems to imply that there has to be some expense on the part of the owner to restore the property to its previous condition.
Answer
?
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
In [case], the court held that spitting on a policeman's coat was not criminal damage. This decision seems to imply that there has to be some expense on the part of the owner to restore the property to its previous condition.
Answer
A (a juvenile) v R [1978] Crim LR 689
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In A (a juvenile) v R [1978] Crim LR 689, the court held that spitting on a policeman's coat was not criminal damage. This decision seems to imply that there has to be some expense on the part of the owner to restore the pro
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.