the defendant put forward the additional argument that he was entitled to rely on the CDA 1971, s 5(2)(b) because he had acted to protect property in the Gulf States. Applying the objective test from Hunt, the court held that his actions were not capable of having this effect.
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
Blake v DPP
Answer
?
Tags
#cd #crime #law
Question
Blake v DPP
Answer
the defendant put forward the additional argument that he was entitled to rely on the CDA 1971, s 5(2)(b) because he had acted to protect property in the Gulf States. Applying the objective test from Hunt, the court held that his actions were not capable of having this effect.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Blake v DPP (discussed above) the defendant put forward the additional argument that he was entitled to rely on the CDA 1971, s 5(2)(b) because he had acted to protect property in the Gulf States.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.