The present situation would appear to be as follows. Firstly, the judge should consider whether there are any existing authorities which have already established a duty of care in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied:
1. Was the damage to the claimant [...]?
2. Was there a relationship of sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant?
3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the situation?
Answer
reasonably foreseeable
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The present situation would appear to be as follows. Firstly, the judge should consider whether there are any existing authorities which have already established a duty of care in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied:
1. Was the damage to the claimant [...]?
2. Was there a relationship of sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant?
3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the situation?
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The present situation would appear to be as follows. Firstly, the judge should consider whether there are any existing authorities which have already established a duty of care in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied:
1. Was the damage to the claimant [...]?
2. Was there a relationship of sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant?
3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the situation?
Answer
reasonably foreseeable
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it s which have already established a duty of care in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied:
1. Was the damage to the claimant <span>reasonably foreseeable?
2. Was there a relationship of sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant?
3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the s
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.