Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The present situation would appear to be as follows. Firstly, the judge should consider whether there are any existing authorities which have already established a duty of care in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied:
1. Was the damage to the claimant reasonably foreseeable?
2. Was there a [...]?
3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the situation?
Answer
relationship of sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The present situation would appear to be as follows. Firstly, the judge should consider whether there are any existing authorities which have already established a duty of care in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied:
1. Was the damage to the claimant reasonably foreseeable?
2. Was there a [...]?
3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the situation?
Answer
?

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
The present situation would appear to be as follows. Firstly, the judge should consider whether there are any existing authorities which have already established a duty of care in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied:
1. Was the damage to the claimant reasonably foreseeable?
2. Was there a [...]?
3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the situation?
Answer
relationship of sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
are in the situation being considered. If no such precedent exists, the judge should only impose a duty of care if the following three-stage test is satisfied: 1. Was the damage to the claimant reasonably foreseeable? 2. Was there a <span>relationship of sufficient proximity between the claimant and the defendant? 3. Is it ‘fair, just and reasonable’ for the law to impose a duty of care in the situation?<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.