Desmond v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3
Answer
The police did not owe a duty of care to the claimant when they denied his CRB check thus impeding his employment as a teacher. Such a duty would have conflicted with the statutory purpose of protecting vulnerable young people.
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
Desmond v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
Desmond v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3
Answer
The police did not owe a duty of care to the claimant when they denied his CRB check thus impeding his employment as a teacher. Such a duty would have conflicted with the statutory purpose of protecting vulnerable young people.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it in Desmond v Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire Police [2011] EWCA Civ 3 the police did not owe a duty of care to the claimant when they denied his CRB check thus impeding his employment as a teacher. Such a duty would have conflicted with the statutory pu
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.