Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In [case], the claimant suffered psychiatric injury having been raped by a fellow police officer and ostracised and bullied by her colleagues. She claimed that the police authorities had failed to deal with her complaint properly and had allowed other officers to victimise her.

The House of Lords held that in deciding if immunity existed, consideration had to be given to the primary role of the police (namely, to deter crime) and to the wider public interest issue of ensuring the police service is run both efficiently and as a responsible employer. In this case, the scales fell in favour of the claimant (note that, technically, this was an employers’ liability claim).
Answer
Waters v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, The Times, 1 August 2000

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In [case], the claimant suffered psychiatric injury having been raped by a fellow police officer and ostracised and bullied by her colleagues. She claimed that the police authorities had failed to deal with her complaint properly and had allowed other officers to victimise her.

The House of Lords held that in deciding if immunity existed, consideration had to be given to the primary role of the police (namely, to deter crime) and to the wider public interest issue of ensuring the police service is run both efficiently and as a responsible employer. In this case, the scales fell in favour of the claimant (note that, technically, this was an employers’ liability claim).
Answer
?

Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
In [case], the claimant suffered psychiatric injury having been raped by a fellow police officer and ostracised and bullied by her colleagues. She claimed that the police authorities had failed to deal with her complaint properly and had allowed other officers to victimise her.

The House of Lords held that in deciding if immunity existed, consideration had to be given to the primary role of the police (namely, to deter crime) and to the wider public interest issue of ensuring the police service is run both efficiently and as a responsible employer. In this case, the scales fell in favour of the claimant (note that, technically, this was an employers’ liability claim).
Answer
Waters v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, The Times, 1 August 2000
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In Waters v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, The Times, 1 August 2000, the claimant suffered psychiatric injury having been raped by a fellow police officer and ostracised and bullied by her colleagues. She claimed that the police authorities had failed t

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.