Thus, in the important House of Lords decision in JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 23, the doctors and social workers investigating suspected child abuse owed a duty of care to the child. A duty was not, however, owed to the parents suspected of abuse since [...].
Answer
it was considered that such a duty would naturally conflict with the duty owed to the child
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
Thus, in the important House of Lords decision in JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 23, the doctors and social workers investigating suspected child abuse owed a duty of care to the child. A duty was not, however, owed to the parents suspected of abuse since [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
Thus, in the important House of Lords decision in JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 23, the doctors and social workers investigating suspected child abuse owed a duty of care to the child. A duty was not, however, owed to the parents suspected of abuse since [...].
Answer
it was considered that such a duty would naturally conflict with the duty owed to the child
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it on in JD v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 23, the doctors and social workers investigating suspected child abuse owed a duty of care to the child. A duty was not, however, owed to the parents suspected of abuse since <span>it was considered that such a duty would naturally conflict with the duty owed to the child. <span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.