Likewise, in Barrett v MOD [1995] (mentioned at 3.4.4), though the defendants were not liable for their employee, a naval pilot, getting drunk and choking to death on his own vomit, they did assume responsibility once [...], e.g. to summon appropriate medical assistance.
Answer
an officer had taken action to care for him
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
Likewise, in Barrett v MOD [1995] (mentioned at 3.4.4), though the defendants were not liable for their employee, a naval pilot, getting drunk and choking to death on his own vomit, they did assume responsibility once [...], e.g. to summon appropriate medical assistance.
Answer
?
Tags
#duty #law #negligence #tort
Question
Likewise, in Barrett v MOD [1995] (mentioned at 3.4.4), though the defendants were not liable for their employee, a naval pilot, getting drunk and choking to death on his own vomit, they did assume responsibility once [...], e.g. to summon appropriate medical assistance.
Answer
an officer had taken action to care for him
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it head>Likewise, in Barrett v MOD [1995] (mentioned at 3.4.4), though the defendants were not liable for their employee, a naval pilot, getting drunk and choking to death on his own vomit, they did assume responsibility once an officer had taken action to care for him, e.g. to summon appropriate medical assistance.<html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.