In [case]The Court of Appeal effectively said a statement of intention to leave property to the claimant in a will is, by itself, insufficient. However, if the statement goes beyond that, perhaps because it is repeated over the course of time, in a way that is inconsistent with it being revocable, then it may amount to an assurance on which a claim can be made.
Answer
Gillett v Holt
Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
In [case]The Court of Appeal effectively said a statement of intention to leave property to the claimant in a will is, by itself, insufficient. However, if the statement goes beyond that, perhaps because it is repeated over the course of time, in a way that is inconsistent with it being revocable, then it may amount to an assurance on which a claim can be made.
Answer
?
Tags
#land #law #proprietary-estoppel
Question
In [case]The Court of Appeal effectively said a statement of intention to leave property to the claimant in a will is, by itself, insufficient. However, if the statement goes beyond that, perhaps because it is repeated over the course of time, in a way that is inconsistent with it being revocable, then it may amount to an assurance on which a claim can be made.
Answer
Gillett v Holt
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Gillett v Holt The Court of Appeal effectively said a statement of intention to leave property to the claimant in a will is, by itself, insufficient. However, if the statement goes beyond that, perhaps
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.