Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The courts have long been able to rule upon whether a claimed prerogative power actually exists and, if so, on what the scope of that power actually is. In [case] (see Chapter 4), the Crown argued that a prerogative power existed to issue warrants for search and seizure of seditious material. However, the court ruled that such a prerogative did not exist and went on to declare that the search was unlawful because the warrant had no other legal basis either.
Answer
Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1029

Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The courts have long been able to rule upon whether a claimed prerogative power actually exists and, if so, on what the scope of that power actually is. In [case] (see Chapter 4), the Crown argued that a prerogative power existed to issue warrants for search and seizure of seditious material. However, the court ruled that such a prerogative did not exist and went on to declare that the search was unlawful because the warrant had no other legal basis either.
Answer
?

Tags
#constitution #law #public
Question
The courts have long been able to rule upon whether a claimed prerogative power actually exists and, if so, on what the scope of that power actually is. In [case] (see Chapter 4), the Crown argued that a prerogative power existed to issue warrants for search and seizure of seditious material. However, the court ruled that such a prerogative did not exist and went on to declare that the search was unlawful because the warrant had no other legal basis either.
Answer
Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1029
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
The courts have long been able to rule upon whether a claimed prerogative power actually exists and, if so, on what the scope of that power actually is. In Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1029 (see Chapter 4), the Crown argued that a prerogative power existed to issue warrants for search and seizure of seditious material. However, the court ruled that such a prerogative did

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.