It has been suggested that the decision may have been different if the company had been aware of the plaintiff's inability to read, as it would then have been clear that simply handing over the ticket did not amount to reasonable notice. This appears to have been given judicial support in [case]where the contract was written in German, and an exclusion clause was inserted without the knowledge of the other party. The party relying on the clause knew that the other could not read the language in which the clause was expressed. The Court of Appeal held that the clause in question had not been incorporated.
Answer
Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde GmbH (1988) 8 Tr L 138
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
It has been suggested that the decision may have been different if the company had been aware of the plaintiff's inability to read, as it would then have been clear that simply handing over the ticket did not amount to reasonable notice. This appears to have been given judicial support in [case]where the contract was written in German, and an exclusion clause was inserted without the knowledge of the other party. The party relying on the clause knew that the other could not read the language in which the clause was expressed. The Court of Appeal held that the clause in question had not been incorporated.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
It has been suggested that the decision may have been different if the company had been aware of the plaintiff's inability to read, as it would then have been clear that simply handing over the ticket did not amount to reasonable notice. This appears to have been given judicial support in [case]where the contract was written in German, and an exclusion clause was inserted without the knowledge of the other party. The party relying on the clause knew that the other could not read the language in which the clause was expressed. The Court of Appeal held that the clause in question had not been incorporated.
Answer
Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde GmbH (1988) 8 Tr L 138
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it een different if the company had been aware of the plaintiff's inability to read, as it would then have been clear that simply handing over the ticket did not amount to reasonable notice. This appears to have been given judicial support in <span>Harvey v Ventilatorenfabrik Oelde GmbH (1988) 8 Tr L 138 where the contract was written in German, and an exclusion clause was inserted without the knowledge of the other party. The party relying on the clause knew that the other could not r
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.