All l say is that it is so wide and so destructive of rights that the court should not rule any man bound by it unless it is drawn to his attention in the most explicit way. It is an instance for what I had in mind in Spurling v Bradshaw [1956] 1 WLR 461 when I stated that in order to give sufficient notice, it would need to be printed in red ink with a red hand pointing to it, or something equally startling.
All l say is that it is so wide and so destructive of rights that the court should not rule any man bound by it unless it is drawn to his attention in the most explicit way. It is an instance for what I had in mind in Spurling v Bradshaw [1956] 1 WLR 461 when I stated that in order to give sufficient notice, it would need to be printed in red ink with a red hand pointing to it, or something equally startling.
All l say is that it is so wide and so destructive of rights that the court should not rule any man bound by it unless it is drawn to his attention in the most explicit way. It is an instance for what I had in mind in Spurling v Bradshaw [1956] 1 WLR 461 when I stated that in order to give sufficient notice, it would need to be printed in red ink with a red hand pointing to it, or something equally startling.
| status | not learned | measured difficulty | 37% [default] | last interval [days] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| repetition number in this series | 0 | memorised on | scheduled repetition | ||||
| scheduled repetition interval | last repetition or drill |