[case]where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four times per month over a period of three years.
Answer
Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
[case]where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four times per month over a period of three years.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
[case]where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four times per month over a period of three years.
Answer
Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.