Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used [...]over a period of three years.
Answer
three or four times per month
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used [...]over a period of three years.
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used [...]over a period of three years.
Answer
three or four times per month
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it ry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used <span>three or four times per month over a period of three years.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.