Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four times per month over a period of [...].
Answer
three years
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four times per month over a period of [...].
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
Harry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four times per month over a period of [...].
Answer
three years
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31 where the House of Lords held (albeit obiter) that a clause had been incorporated by a course of dealing. The same sale note (containing the relevant term) had been used three or four times per month over a period of <span>three years.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.