It should be noted that the courts apply the contra proferentem rule with less rigour where the clause in question merely limits (rather than excludes) liability
Answer
Ailsa Craig Fishing Co Ltd v Malvern Fishing Co [1983] 1 WLR 964
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
It should be noted that the courts apply the contra proferentem rule with less rigour where the clause in question merely limits (rather than excludes) liability
Answer
?
Tags
#contract #exemption #law
Question
It should be noted that the courts apply the contra proferentem rule with less rigour where the clause in question merely limits (rather than excludes) liability
Answer
Ailsa Craig Fishing Co Ltd v Malvern Fishing Co [1983] 1 WLR 964
If you want to change selection, open document below and click on "Move attachment"
pdf
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.