Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
To be seen to accommodate the dominant tenement, it is also necessary to show that the dominant and servient tenements are sufficiently proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As Byles J said in the case of [case]: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.
Answer
Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS) 91

Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
To be seen to accommodate the dominant tenement, it is also necessary to show that the dominant and servient tenements are sufficiently proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As Byles J said in the case of [case]: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.
Answer
?

Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
To be seen to accommodate the dominant tenement, it is also necessary to show that the dominant and servient tenements are sufficiently proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As Byles J said in the case of [case]: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.
Answer
Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS) 91
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
ly proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As Byles J said in the case of <span>Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS) 91: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.