To be seen to accommodate the dominant tenement, it is also necessary to show that the dominant and servient tenements are sufficiently proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As [who]said in the case of Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS) 91: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.
Answer
Byles J
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
To be seen to accommodate the dominant tenement, it is also necessary to show that the dominant and servient tenements are sufficiently proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As [who]said in the case of Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS) 91: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
To be seen to accommodate the dominant tenement, it is also necessary to show that the dominant and servient tenements are sufficiently proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As [who]said in the case of Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS) 91: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.
Answer
Byles J
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it t tenements are sufficiently proximate to one another. Without such proximity, it may be difficult to prove that there is some benefit conferred upon the dominant tenement by the right being exercised over the servient tenement. As <span>Byles J said in the case of Bailey v Stephens (1862) 12 CB (NS) 91: ‘you cannot have a right of way over land in Kent appurtenant to an estate in Northumberland’.<span><body><html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.