In [case], the easement claimed was the right to a TV signal. This was rejected as being a new type of negative easement that would restrict the development of the servient land. The court said that the appropriate way of restricting development on land would be by way of restrictive covenant (which cannot arise by prescription and are most unlikely to arise my implication and thus require the conscious agreement of the parties) or by claiming a recognised type of negative easement: a right of light or air.
Answer
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
In [case], the easement claimed was the right to a TV signal. This was rejected as being a new type of negative easement that would restrict the development of the servient land. The court said that the appropriate way of restricting development on land would be by way of restrictive covenant (which cannot arise by prescription and are most unlikely to arise my implication and thus require the conscious agreement of the parties) or by claiming a recognised type of negative easement: a right of light or air.
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
In [case], the easement claimed was the right to a TV signal. This was rejected as being a new type of negative easement that would restrict the development of the servient land. The court said that the appropriate way of restricting development on land would be by way of restrictive covenant (which cannot arise by prescription and are most unlikely to arise my implication and thus require the conscious agreement of the parties) or by claiming a recognised type of negative easement: a right of light or air.
Answer
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] AC 655, the easement claimed was the right to a TV signal. This was rejected as being a new type of negative easement that would restrict the development of the servient land. The court said
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.