Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
In [case], a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on the servient land, there was no interference with their reasonable use of their land.
Answer
Hair v Gillman (2000) 80 P & CR 108

Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
In [case], a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on the servient land, there was no interference with their reasonable use of their land.
Answer
?

Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
In [case], a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on the servient land, there was no interference with their reasonable use of their land.
Answer
Hair v Gillman (2000) 80 P & CR 108
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In Hair v Gillman (2000) 80 P & CR 108, a right to park in any one of four spaces was upheld as an easement. The dominant owner did not use the same space every day. As the servient owner could still use three spaces on

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.