Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
Furthermore, in [case], the High Court once again confirmed that Batchelor v Marlow had not been overruled and remained binding upon it. The claimant’s right to use designated parking spaces was deemed to be by virtue of an easement rather than being part of the demise under their lease. HHJ David Cooke held that the freeholder had not been deprived of reasonable use of the spaces since he could still do anything on them, except to the extent that it would be inconsistent with an express right to park a car. So, for example, he could still pass freely over the spaces on foot or by vehicle, if there was no vehicle parked on them for the time being or by avoiding one that was. He could authorise others to do the same. He could likewise choose to repair or change the surface. He could lay pipes under the space or, in principle, build above it.
Answer
Kettel & Ors v Bloomfold Ltd [2012] EWHC 1422

Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
Furthermore, in [case], the High Court once again confirmed that Batchelor v Marlow had not been overruled and remained binding upon it. The claimant’s right to use designated parking spaces was deemed to be by virtue of an easement rather than being part of the demise under their lease. HHJ David Cooke held that the freeholder had not been deprived of reasonable use of the spaces since he could still do anything on them, except to the extent that it would be inconsistent with an express right to park a car. So, for example, he could still pass freely over the spaces on foot or by vehicle, if there was no vehicle parked on them for the time being or by avoiding one that was. He could authorise others to do the same. He could likewise choose to repair or change the surface. He could lay pipes under the space or, in principle, build above it.
Answer
?

Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
Furthermore, in [case], the High Court once again confirmed that Batchelor v Marlow had not been overruled and remained binding upon it. The claimant’s right to use designated parking spaces was deemed to be by virtue of an easement rather than being part of the demise under their lease. HHJ David Cooke held that the freeholder had not been deprived of reasonable use of the spaces since he could still do anything on them, except to the extent that it would be inconsistent with an express right to park a car. So, for example, he could still pass freely over the spaces on foot or by vehicle, if there was no vehicle parked on them for the time being or by avoiding one that was. He could authorise others to do the same. He could likewise choose to repair or change the surface. He could lay pipes under the space or, in principle, build above it.
Answer
Kettel & Ors v Bloomfold Ltd [2012] EWHC 1422
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
Furthermore, in Kettel & Ors v Bloomfold Ltd [2012] EWHC 1422, the High Court once again confirmed that Batchelor v Marlow had not been overruled and remained binding upon it. The claimant’s right to use designated parking spaces was deemed to b

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.