The comments made on s 62 in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of [case]. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of Broomfield v Williams [1987] 1 Ch 602, where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later explained as being an exception to the general rule that prior diversity is required; an exception that applies specifically to rights to light.
Answer
Payne v Inwood (1996) 74 P&CR 42
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
The comments made on s 62 in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of [case]. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of Broomfield v Williams [1987] 1 Ch 602, where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later explained as being an exception to the general rule that prior diversity is required; an exception that applies specifically to rights to light.
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
The comments made on s 62 in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of [case]. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of Broomfield v Williams [1987] 1 Ch 602, where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later explained as being an exception to the general rule that prior diversity is required; an exception that applies specifically to rights to light.
Answer
Payne v Inwood (1996) 74 P&CR 42
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The comments made on s 62 in that case are obiter dicta, but the requirement for prior diversity was confirmed in the Court of Appeal decision of Payne v Inwood (1996) 74 P&CR 42. A conflicting decision was reached by the Court of Appeal in the case of Broomfield v Williams [1987] 1 Ch 602, where no prior diversity was deemed necessary. However, it was later e
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.