The question is not ‘how much light has been taken away?’ but rather ‘how much light is left?’ In [case], the court said that the dominant tenement owner is entitled to such light ‘as will leave his premises adequately lit for all ordinary purposes for which they may reasonably be expected to be used’.
Answer
Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 922
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
The question is not ‘how much light has been taken away?’ but rather ‘how much light is left?’ In [case], the court said that the dominant tenement owner is entitled to such light ‘as will leave his premises adequately lit for all ordinary purposes for which they may reasonably be expected to be used’.
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
The question is not ‘how much light has been taken away?’ but rather ‘how much light is left?’ In [case], the court said that the dominant tenement owner is entitled to such light ‘as will leave his premises adequately lit for all ordinary purposes for which they may reasonably be expected to be used’.
Answer
Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 922
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it The question is not ‘how much light has been taken away?’ but rather ‘how much light is left?’ In Carr-Saunders v Dick McNeil Associates Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 922, the court said that the dominant tenement owner is entitled to such light ‘as will leave his premises adequately lit for all ordinary purposes for which they may reasonably be expect
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.