At law, a deed is necessary for an express release of a legal easement, but equity may interfere if one party has been prejudiced by relying on a written or oral release; see [case].
Answer
Waterloo v Bacon (1866) LR 2 Eq 514
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
At law, a deed is necessary for an express release of a legal easement, but equity may interfere if one party has been prejudiced by relying on a written or oral release; see [case].
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
At law, a deed is necessary for an express release of a legal easement, but equity may interfere if one party has been prejudiced by relying on a written or oral release; see [case].
Answer
Waterloo v Bacon (1866) LR 2 Eq 514
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it tml>At law, a deed is necessary for an express release of a legal easement, but equity may interfere if one party has been prejudiced by relying on a written or oral release; see Waterloo v Bacon (1866) LR 2 Eq 514.<html>
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.