30 years’ non-use of a right of way coupled with developments which made it difficult to use the route, such as growth of vegetation, creation of an earth bank and fencing, did not make the way impassable and also did not evidence sufficient intention to abandon the way.
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
Willams v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd
Answer
?
Tags
#easements #land #law
Question
Willams v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd
Answer
30 years’ non-use of a right of way coupled with developments which made it difficult to use the route, such as growth of vegetation, creation of an earth bank and fencing, did not make the way impassable and also did not evidence sufficient intention to abandon the way.
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it Willams v Sandy Lane (Chester) Ltd 30 years’ non-use of a right of way coupled with developments which made it difficult to use the route, such as growth of vegetation, creation of an earth bank and fencing, did not make
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.