In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the [statute]. (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)
Answer
TA 1968, s 4(1)
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the [statute]. (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the [statute]. (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)
Answer
TA 1968, s 4(1)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the TA 1968, s 4(1). (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.