Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the [statute]. (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)
Answer
TA 1968, s 4(1)

Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the [statute]. (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the [statute]. (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)
Answer
TA 1968, s 4(1)
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
In Oxford v Moss, it was held that confidential information cannot fall within the definition of intangible property contained in the TA 1968, s 4(1). (1978) 68 Cr App R 183.)

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.