Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.



Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
[case] HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was evidence that they were in control of the factory and thereby had control of the scrap metal, which unknown to them, had been left inside the factory.
Answer
R v Woodman [1974] 2 All ER 955

Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
[case] HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was evidence that they were in control of the factory and thereby had control of the scrap metal, which unknown to them, had been left inside the factory.
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
[case] HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was evidence that they were in control of the factory and thereby had control of the scrap metal, which unknown to them, had been left inside the factory.
Answer
R v Woodman [1974] 2 All ER 955
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
R v Woodman [1974] 2 All ER 955 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was evidence that they were in control of the factory and thereby had cont

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions


Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.