R v Woodman [1974] 2 All ER 955 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was [...]and thereby had control of the scrap metal, which unknown to them, had been left inside the factory.
Answer
evidence that they were in control of the factory
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
R v Woodman [1974] 2 All ER 955 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was [...]and thereby had control of the scrap metal, which unknown to them, had been left inside the factory.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
R v Woodman [1974] 2 All ER 955 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was [...]and thereby had control of the scrap metal, which unknown to them, had been left inside the factory.
Answer
evidence that they were in control of the factory
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it R v Woodman [1974] 2 All ER 955 HELD: The Court of Appeal held that, because the factory owners had taken steps to exclude trespassers, there was evidence that they were in control of the factory and thereby had control of the scrap metal, which unknown to them, had been left inside the factory.
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.