Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
[case] FACTS: The defendant, a travel agent, took money for flights. Instead of using the money to buy airline tickets, he put it into the business account and it was used to pay off his creditors. Subsequently, the defendant went bankrupt and the customers lost the money they had paid to him. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the TA 1968, s 5(3) did not apply because it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way, or that an obligation to do so was undertaken by him. Although the clients expected tickets in return for their money, they did not expect their the money to be kept separately, but rather to go towards the general running of the business.
Answer
R v Hall [1972] 2 All ER 1009

Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
[case] FACTS: The defendant, a travel agent, took money for flights. Instead of using the money to buy airline tickets, he put it into the business account and it was used to pay off his creditors. Subsequently, the defendant went bankrupt and the customers lost the money they had paid to him. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the TA 1968, s 5(3) did not apply because it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way, or that an obligation to do so was undertaken by him. Although the clients expected tickets in return for their money, they did not expect their the money to be kept separately, but rather to go towards the general running of the business.
Answer
?

Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
[case] FACTS: The defendant, a travel agent, took money for flights. Instead of using the money to buy airline tickets, he put it into the business account and it was used to pay off his creditors. Subsequently, the defendant went bankrupt and the customers lost the money they had paid to him. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the TA 1968, s 5(3) did not apply because it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way, or that an obligation to do so was undertaken by him. Although the clients expected tickets in return for their money, they did not expect their the money to be kept separately, but rather to go towards the general running of the business.
Answer
R v Hall [1972] 2 All ER 1009
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
R v Hall [1972] 2 All ER 1009 FACTS: The defendant, a travel agent, took money for flights. Instead of using the money to buy airline tickets, he put it into the business account and it was used to pay off his credi

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.