R v Hall [1972] 2 All ER 1009 FACTS: The defendant, a travel agent, took money for flights. Instead of using the money to buy airline tickets, he put it into the business account and it was used to pay off his creditors. Subsequently, the defendant went bankrupt and the customers lost the money they had paid to him. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the TA 1968, s 5(3) did not apply because [...]. Although the clients expected tickets in return for their money, they did not expect their the money to be kept separately, but rather to go towards the general running of the business.
Answer
it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way, or that an obligation to do so was undertaken by him
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
R v Hall [1972] 2 All ER 1009 FACTS: The defendant, a travel agent, took money for flights. Instead of using the money to buy airline tickets, he put it into the business account and it was used to pay off his creditors. Subsequently, the defendant went bankrupt and the customers lost the money they had paid to him. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the TA 1968, s 5(3) did not apply because [...]. Although the clients expected tickets in return for their money, they did not expect their the money to be kept separately, but rather to go towards the general running of the business.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
R v Hall [1972] 2 All ER 1009 FACTS: The defendant, a travel agent, took money for flights. Instead of using the money to buy airline tickets, he put it into the business account and it was used to pay off his creditors. Subsequently, the defendant went bankrupt and the customers lost the money they had paid to him. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the TA 1968, s 5(3) did not apply because [...]. Although the clients expected tickets in return for their money, they did not expect their the money to be kept separately, but rather to go towards the general running of the business.
Answer
it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way, or that an obligation to do so was undertaken by him
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it to the business account and it was used to pay off his creditors. Subsequently, the defendant went bankrupt and the customers lost the money they had paid to him. HELD: The Court of Appeal held that the TA 1968, s 5(3) did not apply because <span>it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way, or that an obligation to do so was undertaken by him. Although the clients expected tickets in return for their money, they did not expect their the money to be kept separately, but rather to go towards the general running of the busine
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.