Parker v British Airways Board [1982] 1 All ER 834 FACTS: The defendant was an airline passenger who found a gold bracelet in a British Airways executive lounge. The court considered whether British Airways had possession or control of the bracelet. HELD: The court decided that the company did not, but stated that if it had shown an intention to exercise control over the building and things in it, the company could have secured possession of the bracelet before the defendant found it. The court held that British Airways could have demonstrated this intention [...]. However, in this case it had shown no such intention. When the original owner did not come forward to claim the bracelet it could be kept by the passenger.
Answer
either expressly, for example by putting up a notice, or impliedly
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
Parker v British Airways Board [1982] 1 All ER 834 FACTS: The defendant was an airline passenger who found a gold bracelet in a British Airways executive lounge. The court considered whether British Airways had possession or control of the bracelet. HELD: The court decided that the company did not, but stated that if it had shown an intention to exercise control over the building and things in it, the company could have secured possession of the bracelet before the defendant found it. The court held that British Airways could have demonstrated this intention [...]. However, in this case it had shown no such intention. When the original owner did not come forward to claim the bracelet it could be kept by the passenger.
Answer
?
Tags
#crime #law #theft
Question
Parker v British Airways Board [1982] 1 All ER 834 FACTS: The defendant was an airline passenger who found a gold bracelet in a British Airways executive lounge. The court considered whether British Airways had possession or control of the bracelet. HELD: The court decided that the company did not, but stated that if it had shown an intention to exercise control over the building and things in it, the company could have secured possession of the bracelet before the defendant found it. The court held that British Airways could have demonstrated this intention [...]. However, in this case it had shown no such intention. When the original owner did not come forward to claim the bracelet it could be kept by the passenger.
Answer
either expressly, for example by putting up a notice, or impliedly
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"
Parent (intermediate) annotation
Open it d shown an intention to exercise control over the building and things in it, the company could have secured possession of the bracelet before the defendant found it. The court held that British Airways could have demonstrated this intention <span>either expressly, for example by putting up a notice, or impliedly. However, in this case it had shown no such intention. When the original owner did not come forward to claim the bracelet it could be kept by the passenger. <span><body></htm
Original toplevel document (pdf)
cannot see any pdfs
Summary
status
not learned
measured difficulty
37% [default]
last interval [days]
repetition number in this series
0
memorised on
scheduled repetition
scheduled repetition interval
last repetition or drill
Details
No repetitions
Discussion
Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.