Do you want BuboFlash to help you learning these things? Or do you want to add or correct something? Click here to log in or create user.


  • Presentation
  • Question
  • Answer

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
In Walton Harvey Ltd v Walker & Homfrays Ltd [1931] 1 Ch 274, the defendants agreed to allow an advertising sign to be displayed on their hotel for a period of seven years. Before the seven years had expired, the local authority demolished the hotel. The defendants maintained that this event frustrated the contract. It was held that [...]. They knew of the risk of the local authority demolishing the hotel and could have made provision for that in the contract.
Answer
the defendants were liable in damages

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
In Walton Harvey Ltd v Walker & Homfrays Ltd [1931] 1 Ch 274, the defendants agreed to allow an advertising sign to be displayed on their hotel for a period of seven years. Before the seven years had expired, the local authority demolished the hotel. The defendants maintained that this event frustrated the contract. It was held that [...]. They knew of the risk of the local authority demolishing the hotel and could have made provision for that in the contract.
Answer
?

Tags
#contract #frustration #law
Question
In Walton Harvey Ltd v Walker & Homfrays Ltd [1931] 1 Ch 274, the defendants agreed to allow an advertising sign to be displayed on their hotel for a period of seven years. Before the seven years had expired, the local authority demolished the hotel. The defendants maintained that this event frustrated the contract. It was held that [...]. They knew of the risk of the local authority demolishing the hotel and could have made provision for that in the contract.
Answer
the defendants were liable in damages
If you want to change selection, open original toplevel document below and click on "Move attachment"

Parent (intermediate) annotation

Open it
n advertising sign to be displayed on their hotel for a period of seven years. Before the seven years had expired, the local authority demolished the hotel. The defendants maintained that this event frustrated the contract. It was held that <span>the defendants were liable in damages. They knew of the risk of the local authority demolishing the hotel and could have made provision for that in the contract.<span><body><html>

Original toplevel document (pdf)

cannot see any pdfs

Summary

statusnot learnedmeasured difficulty37% [default]last interval [days]               
repetition number in this series0memorised on               scheduled repetition               
scheduled repetition interval               last repetition or drill

Details

No repetitions

Discussion

Do you want to join discussion? Click here to log in or create user.